Almost anything can be negotiated with the application of sound principles. The biggest misunderstanding is not so much how to negotiate, but when. Salespeople eager to do the deal often initiate premature negotiation, trying to negotiate before the time is right.
So, when is the best time to negotiate? In the majority of sales situations, salespeople attempt to enter into negotiation before the customer has agreed to do business. There is a better, more productive approach.
Sales professionals engage in negotiation when a customer has expressed an interest to do business. We negotiate after the confirmation step, after the customer has agreed to do business with you.
Upon initial reflection this concept may seem bizarre and contrary to traditional sales techniques, but that's only because you've done it that way for years. Although it may have worked for you in the past, it's not a very smooth or fluid approach.
Confirmation has two aspects: initial confirmation, where the customer is in agreement and willingly moves into the negotiation phase; and final confirmation, where the customer has accepted all the terms and conditions of your solution, including price. Initial confirmation may sound like this: "If we can work out a competitive price, may I have your business?" If the customer is in agreement, you now have earned the right to negotiate. It's much easier to negotiate terms, conditions, and price once you have a willing party. Your next step is final confirmation: "Now that we have agreed on a competitive price may I have your business?" It doesn't need to get any more complicated than that.
In our two-day sales negotiation seminar, salespeople are often shocked to learn that price should not be part of the sale. It's a separate discussion that takes place as part of negotiating final confirmation. It's no different than buying a house. You decide on location, size, number of bedrooms, and other features. After you pick a home you make an offer, which means you are now negotiating. The offer goes back and forth as both parties negotiate all the details, including price. In most cases the negotiating goes smoothly because there are two willing parties, a seller and a buyer. Use the same advantage in sales, by using your Sequential Model to create a willing buyer.
Negotiate after initial confirmation.
Ask: Have I earned the right to negotiate?
Now it's in each party's best interests to negotiate a win-win-win-win solution. The four winners are your customer and his or her company, and you and your company. With two willing parties there is always a way, in spite of initial barriers and disagreements. Details can be worked out when both parties are motivated to do so. If not, details can easily undermine a possible solution. It's not a good deal if one of the four wins is missing or compromised. The idea is to reach mutually beneficial agreements that resolve inconveniences or dissatisfaction and solidify long-term relationships.
Trust plays a major role in successful negotiation. Although there is no guarantee that trust will lead to collaboration, mistrust will inhibit collaboration. When people trust one another, they are more likely to communicate openly and honestly. In contrast, if people do not trust you they are more likely to withdraw and be less cooperative. Acting in a trusting manner throughout the relationship serves as an invitation to others to be trustworthy, especially if your trusting manner is consistent. Each negotiator must believe that both parties choose to behave in a cooperative manner. Trust is not a one-time, singular event. It is established over time by demonstrating professionalism, honesty, integrity, consistency, and cooperation and by following through on promises and commitments. Cooperative behavior is a signal of honesty, openness, and a shared commitment to a joint solution. Take advantage of the trust engineered throughout the first seven steps of the model. Remember, people judge us by our actions, not by our intentions.
Approaches to negotiation tend to reflect personal experiences, biases, and perceptions of the individuals involved. They are often reflected in one of two ways: flight or fight. People who take the flight approach are uncomfortable with conflict and try to avoid possible rejection, frustration, and anger associated with negotiation. They become masters at avoidance and readily prefer to take flight rather than experience any degree of conflict. Relaters tend to take the flight approach.
The fight approach is supported by a mindset of, "Only the strong survive," and "Do unto others before they do unto you." Directors tend to favor this approach. It's a classic win-lose scenario. Bargaining and compromise are two components of fight. Bargaining is where you have a predetermined position and you haggle back and forth, working hard, grinding your opponent down. You pursue this approach until you are victorious. Compromise occurs when both sides give in and split the difference, settling for half a loaf. Compromise may satisfy both parties, but only to a limited extent. Of course, half a loaf in a highly competitive arena may be viewed as better than none but if it becomes normal practice the results may be less than desirable for both sides.
A more effective approach, one that fosters long-term relationships, is creative negotiation. Creative negotiation is defined as: "Both parties seek to resolve their differences by working synergistically to create a higher quality, value-added solution. Both parties acknowledge the need to reach agreement, working amicably and creatively toward a solution that satisfies each."
0 comments:
Post a Comment